Although I did not get to ask a question at today’s White House East Room event in which President Obama gave remarks about the BP oil spill and took questions from reporters — mainly about the oil spill — here’s the question I was prepared to ask were I given the opportunity:
Thank you, Mr. President. My question is about the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal compromise amendment that faces House and Senate votes as early as this afternoon. Adm. Mullen said yesterday of the conditions in the amendment, “That trigger is to certify whether we should move ahead with that change.”
Earlier, and repeatedly, however, Sec. Gates said of the study, “This is not a question of if, but how.”
Which is it, Mr. President, and is your understanding of the compromise that the certification is discretionary? And, if so, why is that discretion necessary if the study truly is only looking into how to implement repeal?
But, I did not get to ask my question, so, it remains unanswered.
Here is the background, from my two reports at Metro Weekly on Wednesday: “Discretion Required,” about the impact of the amendment, and “Digging Into the Details,” which looks at the Senate vote count and features my interviews with Reps. Murphy and Frank on the House side.
Popularity: 40% [?]

I really wish I could get kudos from my wife for stuff like this.
“Honey, I will stop overspending on gadgets. It’s a done deal. Of course, first I need a panel of fellow gadget-addicts to certify that doing so will cause no harm. That review should take… oh, until after our next tax filing. Sure, sure, all the documentation says that the certification is conditional, but don’t worry, it’s a done deal.”
Needless to say, not being as charismatic as Obama, this would not get me doe-eyed loving stares.
If your wife’s current alternative suitor is *proud* of overspending on gadgets, and her prior partner had promised to stop all gadget spending and then had signed off on a budget mandating such spending, I think you’d look pretty adorable in comparison.