<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wisdom of Obama&#8217;s Movements on Nominees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawdork.net/2010/02/12/the-wisdom-of-obamas-movements-on-nominees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawdork.net/2010/02/12/the-wisdom-of-obamas-movements-on-nominees/</link>
	<description>Same dork, new year!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:38:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Feldblum, Others to the EEOC in Series of Recess Appointments</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2010/02/12/the-wisdom-of-obamas-movements-on-nominees/#comment-7306</link>
		<dc:creator>Feldblum, Others to the EEOC in Series of Recess Appointments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 01:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=4756#comment-7306</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote on Feb. 11 that he would not be issuing recess appointments during the previous recess. I wrote at the time: At this point, the Senate Republicans have made clear that they are concerned about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote on Feb. 11 that he would not be issuing recess appointments during the previous recess. I wrote at the time: At this point, the Senate Republicans have made clear that they are concerned about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

