<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Walker: Ninth Circuit to Consider Prop 8 Docs&#8217; Fate En Banc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawdork.net/2009/12/16/walker-ninth-circuit-to-consider-prop-8-docs-fate-en-banc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/12/16/walker-ninth-circuit-to-consider-prop-8-docs-fate-en-banc/</link>
	<description>Same dork, new year!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:38:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Volokh Conspiracy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rumor: Judge Walker States That the Prop. 8 Campaign Documents Discovery Dispute Will Go En Banc at the Ninth Circuit</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/12/16/walker-ninth-circuit-to-consider-prop-8-docs-fate-en-banc/#comment-6085</link>
		<dc:creator>The Volokh Conspiracy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rumor: Judge Walker States That the Prop. 8 Campaign Documents Discovery Dispute Will Go En Banc at the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=4265#comment-6085</guid>
		<description>[...] what I hear, third-hand (via Chris Geidner (Law Dork)) about what Judge Walker supposedly said at a hearing today; he was reporting that such an order [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what I hear, third-hand (via Chris Geidner (Law Dork)) about what Judge Walker supposedly said at a hearing today; he was reporting that such an order [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

