<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The OPM-Ninth Circuit Dispute, Disentangled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawdork.net/2009/12/07/the-opm-ninth-circuit-dispute-disentangled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/12/07/the-opm-ninth-circuit-dispute-disentangled/</link>
	<description>Same dork, new year!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:38:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Viva Mexico! &#171; Rainbow Mittens</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/12/07/the-opm-ninth-circuit-dispute-disentangled/#comment-6144</link>
		<dc:creator>Viva Mexico! &#171; Rainbow Mittens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=4187#comment-6144</guid>
		<description>[...] reason I mention it is because the federal government&#8217;s Office of Personnel Management continues to sputter at the prospect of providing benefits to same-sex couples, in defiance of an order from the 9th [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reason I mention it is because the federal government&#8217;s Office of Personnel Management continues to sputter at the prospect of providing benefits to same-sex couples, in defiance of an order from the 9th [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/12/07/the-opm-ninth-circuit-dispute-disentangled/#comment-6027</link>
		<dc:creator>IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=4187#comment-6027</guid>
		<description>I would really like to hear your take on the appeal panel throwing out Justice Walker&#039;s order to the Prop8 defendants to disclose campaign memos, in the Perry v. Schwarzeneggar case.  I find this quite discouraging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would really like to hear your take on the appeal panel throwing out Justice Walker&#8217;s order to the Prop8 defendants to disclose campaign memos, in the Perry v. Schwarzeneggar case.  I find this quite discouraging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abby</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/12/07/the-opm-ninth-circuit-dispute-disentangled/#comment-5985</link>
		<dc:creator>Abby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=4187#comment-5985</guid>
		<description>Chris, thanks for this analysis.  It&#039;s very helpful to better understand what&#039;s really going on here, especially how the separation of powers are involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, thanks for this analysis.  It&#8217;s very helpful to better understand what&#8217;s really going on here, especially how the separation of powers are involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

