<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One More Day . . . One Day More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawdork.net/2009/11/03/one-more-day-one-day-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/11/03/one-more-day-one-day-more/</link>
	<description>Same dork, new year!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:38:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PG</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/11/03/one-more-day-one-day-more/#comment-5601</link>
		<dc:creator>PG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=4005#comment-5601</guid>
		<description>FlexSF,

What can legislative action do? The legislature and executive already did their bit: they drafted, debated, passed and signed a law to recognize same-sex marriage in Maine. A referendum in an odd-year election (when senior citizens vote but young people don&#039;t) rejected the law. The legislature and executive (representative democracy) cannot override a referendum (direct democracy). Unless a Maine court finds that this is somehow the kind of matter that cannot go onto a referendum -- a question that should have been litigated well before the election -- there&#039;s no basis for court action, and particularly no basis for federal court action.

What I&#039;m wondering is whether the old Bradley/Wilder effect has actually become a SSM effect: people tell pollsters that they won&#039;t vote against equality, but in the privacy of the voting booth, they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FlexSF,</p>
<p>What can legislative action do? The legislature and executive already did their bit: they drafted, debated, passed and signed a law to recognize same-sex marriage in Maine. A referendum in an odd-year election (when senior citizens vote but young people don&#8217;t) rejected the law. The legislature and executive (representative democracy) cannot override a referendum (direct democracy). Unless a Maine court finds that this is somehow the kind of matter that cannot go onto a referendum &#8212; a question that should have been litigated well before the election &#8212; there&#8217;s no basis for court action, and particularly no basis for federal court action.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m wondering is whether the old Bradley/Wilder effect has actually become a SSM effect: people tell pollsters that they won&#8217;t vote against equality, but in the privacy of the voting booth, they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlexSF</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/11/03/one-more-day-one-day-more/#comment-5597</link>
		<dc:creator>FlexSF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=4005#comment-5597</guid>
		<description>Do you really believe that we will allow a bunch of religious lunatics to dictate who we can, or can&#039;t marry? I expect legislative action, or federal court action, from the state of Maine to fight for marriage rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you really believe that we will allow a bunch of religious lunatics to dictate who we can, or can&#8217;t marry? I expect legislative action, or federal court action, from the state of Maine to fight for marriage rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

