http://lawdork.net/2009/08/15/ads-in-my-twitter-feed/ Same dork, new year! Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:38:37 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1 hourly 1 http://lawdork.net/2009/08/15/ads-in-my-twitter-feed/#comment-1836 RobinJP Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:57:32 +0000 http://lawdork.net/?p=3150#comment-1836 that's a great point. those of us in the biz probably would assume separation of church and state, but a civilian reader might think "featured" implies sanctioned, supported, or something more than Paid Advertisement. that’s a great point. those of us in the biz probably would assume separation of church and state, but a civilian reader might think “featured” implies sanctioned, supported, or something more than Paid Advertisement.

]]> http://lawdork.net/2009/08/15/ads-in-my-twitter-feed/#comment-1832 Twitted by MediaReform Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:49:51 +0000 http://lawdork.net/?p=3150#comment-1832 [...] This post was Twitted by MediaReform [...] [...] This post was Twitted by MediaReform [...]

]]> http://lawdork.net/2009/08/15/ads-in-my-twitter-feed/#comment-1831 Chris Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:56:18 +0000 http://lawdork.net/?p=3150#comment-1831 I do think that "Featured Advertiser," if you don't know that they include ads in their stream, could be confused for a news story on said topic. At least much more so than the "fake news copy" ads that find their way into the paper. I do think that “Featured Advertiser,” if you don’t know that they include ads in their stream, could be confused for a news story on said topic. At least much more so than the “fake news copy” ads that find their way into the paper.

]]> http://lawdork.net/2009/08/15/ads-in-my-twitter-feed/#comment-1830 Chris Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:54:27 +0000 http://lawdork.net/?p=3150#comment-1830 Thanks for noting that. Don't follow them, so hadn't seen it. Thanks for noting that. Don’t follow them, so hadn’t seen it.

]]> http://lawdork.net/2009/08/15/ads-in-my-twitter-feed/#comment-1829 Steve BEste Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:55:03 +0000 http://lawdork.net/?p=3150#comment-1829 I have seen links like that from MSNBC as well. From the Morning Joe 'corporate' tweet, not JS or MB personal accounts. I have seen links like that from MSNBC as well. From the Morning Joe ‘corporate’ tweet, not JS or MB personal accounts.

]]> http://lawdork.net/2009/08/15/ads-in-my-twitter-feed/#comment-1828 RobinJP Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:53:14 +0000 http://lawdork.net/?p=3150#comment-1828 Nothing new in trying to slip in ads that look like copy. The Post may be watering down their content in a way that doesn't help the advertiser at all. Love to know what they are charging and what the click rate is. My take on all this: <b><a href="http://robinjp.posterous.com/uh-oh-theres-an-ad-in-my-twitter-soup" rel="nofollow">Uh oh, there's an ad in my Twitter feed.</a></b> Nothing new in trying to slip in ads that look like copy. The Post may be watering down their content in a way that doesn’t help the advertiser at all.
Love to know what they are charging and what the click rate is.
My take on all this: Uh oh, there’s an ad in my Twitter feed.

]]> http://lawdork.net/2009/08/15/ads-in-my-twitter-feed/#comment-1824 Chris Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:50:50 +0000 http://lawdork.net/?p=3150#comment-1824 <a href="http://twitter.com/tos" rel="nofollow">How</a>? How?

]]> http://lawdork.net/2009/08/15/ads-in-my-twitter-feed/#comment-1822 Glenn Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:39:39 +0000 http://lawdork.net/?p=3150#comment-1822 Isn't that breaking Twitter's TOS? Isn’t that breaking Twitter’s TOS?

]]>