<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GLAD Files Amended Complaint in Gill Challenge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawdork.net/2009/08/03/glad-files-amended-complaint-in-gill-challenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/08/03/glad-files-amended-complaint-in-gill-challenge/</link>
	<description>Same dork, new year!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:52:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GLAD: DOJ DOMA Defense &#8216;Misses the Forest for the Trees&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/08/03/glad-files-amended-complaint-in-gill-challenge/#comment-5794</link>
		<dc:creator>GLAD: DOJ DOMA Defense &#8216;Misses the Forest for the Trees&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=2976#comment-5794</guid>
		<description>[...] of marriage and spouse to only opposite-sex couples.  The Amended Complaint in Gill (covered here) alleges that such a limitation is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of marriage and spouse to only opposite-sex couples.  The Amended Complaint in Gill (covered here) alleges that such a limitation is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Administration Begins to Change Its Tune on DOMA &#171; Deanna&#8217;s Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/08/03/glad-files-amended-complaint-in-gill-challenge/#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Administration Begins to Change Its Tune on DOMA &#171; Deanna&#8217;s Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=2976#comment-1976</guid>
		<description>[...] in Gill v. Office of Personnel Management et al., the Massachusetts GLAD case.  I previously discussed the Amended Complaint filed in the case by GLAD earlier this month.  The government&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Gill v. Office of Personnel Management et al., the Massachusetts GLAD case.  I previously discussed the Amended Complaint filed in the case by GLAD earlier this month.  The government&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sideon</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/08/03/glad-files-amended-complaint-in-gill-challenge/#comment-1659</link>
		<dc:creator>Sideon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=2976#comment-1659</guid>
		<description>Yes!  Finally, some lovely statements of how much discrimination costs the LGBT community!  How many couples take it in stride, and take it heavily in the wallet every year, when the cost of covering their partner&#039;s benefits are added to their gross federal taxes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes!  Finally, some lovely statements of how much discrimination costs the LGBT community!  How many couples take it in stride, and take it heavily in the wallet every year, when the cost of covering their partner&#8217;s benefits are added to their gross federal taxes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/08/03/glad-files-amended-complaint-in-gill-challenge/#comment-1652</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 03:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=2976#comment-1652</guid>
		<description>Speaking of cases today... I remember reading that the world-famous Smelt v. US case was supposed to be heard before the US District Court for the Central District of CA today. I couldn&#039;t find anything online via google about how that turned out... I know it&#039;s not as sexy as Perry and it&#039;s probably not going to be as successful but I still think it would be interesting... Is there any way you know what&#039;s going on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of cases today&#8230; I remember reading that the world-famous Smelt v. US case was supposed to be heard before the US District Court for the Central District of CA today. I couldn&#8217;t find anything online via google about how that turned out&#8230; I know it&#8217;s not as sexy as Perry and it&#8217;s probably not going to be as successful but I still think it would be interesting&#8230; Is there any way you know what&#8217;s going on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GLAD Files Amended Complaint in Gill Challenge &#171; Taxes Income</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/08/03/glad-files-amended-complaint-in-gill-challenge/#comment-1650</link>
		<dc:creator>GLAD Files Amended Complaint in Gill Challenge &#171; Taxes Income</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=2976#comment-1650</guid>
		<description>[...] Or&#173;i&#173;gi&#173;n&#173;&#173;al pos&#173;t: G&#173;L&#173;AD Fil&#173;e&#173;s&#173; Am&#173;e&#173;n&#173;de&#173;d Com&#173;p&#173;l&#173;ain&amp;... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Or&#173;i&#173;gi&#173;n&#173;&#173;al pos&#173;t: G&#173;L&#173;AD Fil&#173;e&#173;s&#173; Am&#173;e&#173;n&#173;de&#173;d Com&#173;p&#173;l&#173;ain&amp;&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
