<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liveblogging Sotomayor, Day One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawdork.net/2009/07/13/liveblogging-sotomayor-day-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/07/13/liveblogging-sotomayor-day-one/</link>
	<description>Same dork, new year!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:38:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liveblogging Sotomayor, Day Three</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/07/13/liveblogging-sotomayor-day-one/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>Liveblogging Sotomayor, Day Three</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=2430#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>[...] [Day One and Day Two of the confirmation hearings for Judge Sonia Sotomayor.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Day One and Day Two of the confirmation hearings for Judge Sonia Sotomayor.] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liveblogging Sotomayor, Day Two</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/07/13/liveblogging-sotomayor-day-one/#comment-1349</link>
		<dc:creator>Liveblogging Sotomayor, Day Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=2430#comment-1349</guid>
		<description>[...] [Day One of the Sotomayor hearings are here.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Day One of the Sotomayor hearings are here.] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prup (aka Jim Benton)</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/07/13/liveblogging-sotomayor-day-one/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>Prup (aka Jim Benton)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=2430#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>The key fact about Sessions&#039; speech is that, because the Republicans rotate &#039;ranking member&#039;/chairman posts rather than sticking to seniority, the &#039;face of the Republican Party&#039; will be Sessions -- and because it is, the stories of his racism will continue to come out and be covered.

I know she won&#039;t, but I would love to hear Sotomayor answer his first question about her remarks something like this:

&quot;Unlike some people, when I make remarks that are seen as controversial or which may have been understood, I explain them, rather than claim I had merely been joking when I said them.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key fact about Sessions&#8217; speech is that, because the Republicans rotate &#8216;ranking member&#8217;/chairman posts rather than sticking to seniority, the &#8216;face of the Republican Party&#8217; will be Sessions &#8212; and because it is, the stories of his racism will continue to come out and be covered.</p>
<p>I know she won&#8217;t, but I would love to hear Sotomayor answer his first question about her remarks something like this:</p>
<p>&#8220;Unlike some people, when I make remarks that are seen as controversial or which may have been understood, I explain them, rather than claim I had merely been joking when I said them.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PG</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/07/13/liveblogging-sotomayor-day-one/#comment-1310</link>
		<dc:creator>PG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=2430#comment-1310</guid>
		<description>A &lt;a href=&quot;http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2009/07/sotomayor_hearings_sen_session.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WaPo blogger compares Sessions to Hatch&lt;/a&gt; -- much to Hatch&#039;s favor.

On the other hand, Sessions fulfills the demand for blood that was coming from some Republicans who are still angry about the hearings for Bork, Thomas, Roberts and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogdenovo.org/archives/001174.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alito&lt;/a&gt;. Hatch&#039;s making essentially the same points, but doing so in a courteous and thoughtful way, wouldn&#039;t have been enough to make the base happy. They wanna make Sotomayor&#039;s mama cry (though I think they&#039;ll find she&#039;s got a thick enough skin to handle it -- raising two children in the projects on one&#039;s own will do that).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2009/07/sotomayor_hearings_sen_session.html" rel="nofollow">WaPo blogger compares Sessions to Hatch</a> &#8212; much to Hatch&#8217;s favor.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Sessions fulfills the demand for blood that was coming from some Republicans who are still angry about the hearings for Bork, Thomas, Roberts and <a href="http://www.blogdenovo.org/archives/001174.html" rel="nofollow">Alito</a>. Hatch&#8217;s making essentially the same points, but doing so in a courteous and thoughtful way, wouldn&#8217;t have been enough to make the base happy. They wanna make Sotomayor&#8217;s mama cry (though I think they&#8217;ll find she&#8217;s got a thick enough skin to handle it &#8212; raising two children in the projects on one&#8217;s own will do that).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prup (aka Jim Benton)</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/07/13/liveblogging-sotomayor-day-one/#comment-1304</link>
		<dc:creator>Prup (aka Jim Benton)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=2430#comment-1304</guid>
		<description>For those of you who don&#039;t remember Sessions, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.washingtonmonthly.com/mt/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=19050&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Steve Benen &lt;/a&gt; mentions several examples, including the following:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Also during his illustrious career in Alabama, Sessions called the NAACP &quot;un-American&quot; because it, among other groups, &quot;forced civil rights down the throats of people.&quot; A former career Justice Department official who worked with Sessions recalled an instance when he referred to a white attorney as a &quot;disgrace to his race&quot; for litigating voting rights cases on behalf of African Americans. Sessions later acknowledged having made many of the controversial remarks attributed to him, but claimed to have been joking.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The article he links to, while dating from 2002 gives a far more complete history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who don&#8217;t remember Sessions, <a href="http://www2.washingtonmonthly.com/mt/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=19050" rel="nofollow"> Steve Benen </a> mentions several examples, including the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Also during his illustrious career in Alabama, Sessions called the NAACP &#8220;un-American&#8221; because it, among other groups, &#8220;forced civil rights down the throats of people.&#8221; A former career Justice Department official who worked with Sessions recalled an instance when he referred to a white attorney as a &#8220;disgrace to his race&#8221; for litigating voting rights cases on behalf of African Americans. Sessions later acknowledged having made many of the controversial remarks attributed to him, but claimed to have been joking.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The article he links to, while dating from 2002 gives a far more complete history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prup (aka Jim Benton)</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/07/13/liveblogging-sotomayor-day-one/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>Prup (aka Jim Benton)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.net/?p=2430#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>If -- as implied by his speaking first -- Jeff Sessions is the new &#039;ranking member&#039; of the Republicans on the Judiciary, this can only benefit us.  For the Republicans to choose as their &#039;public face&#039; on the panel someone who was refused a Judgeship because of his proven racism -- a charge that I never use loosely -- can only bring them further defections.

Hatch&#039;s ideas were frequently hideous, but his charm, class, and collegiality made him acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If &#8212; as implied by his speaking first &#8212; Jeff Sessions is the new &#8216;ranking member&#8217; of the Republicans on the Judiciary, this can only benefit us.  For the Republicans to choose as their &#8216;public face&#8217; on the panel someone who was refused a Judgeship because of his proven racism &#8212; a charge that I never use loosely &#8212; can only bring them further defections.</p>
<p>Hatch&#8217;s ideas were frequently hideous, but his charm, class, and collegiality made him acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

