The President of the United States, the leader of the free world, spent 20 minutes this afternoon telling the world that he views Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell as harmful to national security, that he is calling on Congress to repeal the “so-called” — his words — Defense of Marriage Act, and that he wants a fully inclusive ENDA and hate crimes bills on his desk.
Of course, that’s not action.
But to pretend that such an event does not send a very real message to America, ambivalent Democrats on the Hill and opponents of equality requires one to shield his or her eyes from reality.
The President talked about his support for all of our legislative priorities, as well as his Administration’s in-progress efforts to get rid of the HIV travel ban.
The President talked about openly gay people in the Administration, including the important role that OPM Director John Berry already has played in advancing LGBT equality.
The President acknowledged transgender people, both in terms of calling for inclusive hate crimes legislation and an inclusive ENDA and in terms of saying the word, “transgender,” the absence of which was noted after the memorandum signing.
The President said that he wanted us to judge him not by his words but by his actions. He said he “wants to be judged” by “the promises that my Administration keeps.” He is not shying away from or rejecting any campaign promises; he is saying that it’s not happening overnight. I’d like to find one person actually involved in politics who ever thought a DOMA repeal would be a legislative accomplishment of the Administration’s first year. That’s the only part of Obama’s promises to us that I don’t see being accomplished before the mid-term elections.
The President — and, of course, not all will be OK with this — acknowledged the Justice Department’s Smelt brief. He also, and I think much more important than most have thus far given him credit for — took a swipe at the language in the brief. He said:
I’ve called on Congress to repeal the so-called Defense of Marriage Act to help end discrimination against same-sex couples in this country. Now, I want to add, we have a duty to uphold existing law, but I believe we must do so in a way that does not exacerbate old divides. And fulfilling this duty in upholding the law in no way lessens my commitment to reversing this law.
Will this make those who believe, I think incorrectly, that Obama could have just decided not to defend DOMA happy? Of course not. But, for people like me and many others who believe this was not one of the rare situations in which Justice could choose not to defend a validly enacted law, this is a strong statement that Obama wants to see the law repealed and thinks the Smelt brief went too far in some of its divisive language. On this point, Obama said pretty much exactly what I have wanted to hear from him.
Now, what did Obama do wrong today?
He — and the entire White House — refuse even to acknowledge that anyone is calling for more than just legislative repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. If the President agrees that the daily discharge of LGBT soldiers harms national security, then how can the White House continue to ignore the Palm Center and the Center for American Progress reports — not to mention the letter from 77 members of Congress — about how the President can and should take action now to stop the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell discharges?
Truly, someone needs to pose that unambiguous question to the White House each day until we get a real answer. This is not about getting rid of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. We understand that takes a legislative solution. These reports and letters are addressing the underlying fact that the president himself should take immediate action as Commander-in-Chief if he truly believes this is a national security issue.
As for mentions that I’ve seen regarding the ethnic and racial make-up of the event, I’m not sure we saw enough to be able to tell precisely how “white” the event was. Two of the three people I personally know who attended are not white, so my perspective might be a little skewed. I look forward to hearing from attendees about the racial make-up. But, as an underlying point — and one that I think would be acknowledged by most people — I think at least some of the blame regarding the make-up of the event, if it’s determined to have been a problem, likely goes to the groups who gave lists of invitees as much as to the White House.
In all, I think the President used today well to acknowledge our impatience while not diminishing it, saying, “It’s not for me to tell you to be patient.” The President clearly recommitted himself and his Administration to the campaign promises he made to us. Yes, I want to see more action, and, sure, there is room for improvement — particularly in regards to Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell — but I am glad to hear directly from our President that he realizes our struggle and wants to work with us — and use his role in the White House — to advance LGBT equality.
[UPDATE: The full remarks are below the jump. Thanks to @anamariecox, @thenation, Josh Gerstein at Politico and Above the Law for the links.
The video from Monday's event can be found here, and an interview from Secretary of Defense Robert Gates -- suggesting he is considering some moves urged in the congressional letter about Don't Ask, Don't Tell -- can be found here. Also, discussion of why Rep. Jared Polis was misguided in some of his "Hardball" comments on Monday is available here.]
* * * * *
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
___________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release June 29, 2009
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
AT LGBT PRIDE MONTH RECEPTION
East Room
4:35 P.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Hello, everybody. Hello, hello, hello. (Applause.) Hey! Good to see you. (Applause.) I’m waiting for FLOTUS here. FLOTUS always politics more than POTUS.
MRS. OBAMA: No, you move too slow. (Laughter.)
THE PRESIDENT: It is great to see everybody here today and they’re just — I’ve got a lot of friends in the room, but there are some people I want to especially acknowledge. First of all, somebody who helped ensure that we are in the White House, Steve Hildebrand. Please give Steve a big round of applause. (Applause.) Where’s Steve? He’s around here somewhere. (Applause.)
The new chair of the Export-Import Bank, Fred Hochberg. (Applause.) Where’s Fred? There’s Fred. Good to see you, Fred. Our Director of the Institute of Education Sciences at DOE, John Easton. Where’s John? (Applause.) A couple of special friends — Bishop Gene Robinson. Where’s Gene? (Applause.) Hey, Gene. Ambassador Michael Guest is here. (Applause.) Ambassador Jim Hormel is here. (Applause.) Oregon Secretary of State Kate Brown is here. (Applause.)
All of you are here. (Laughter and applause.) Welcome to your White House. (Applause.) So –
AUDIENCE MEMBER: (Inaudible.) (Laughter.)
THE PRESIDENT: Somebody asked from the Lincoln Bedroom here. (Laughter.) You knew I was from Chicago too. (Laughter.)
It’s good to see so many friends and familiar faces, and I deeply appreciate the support I’ve received from so many of you. Michelle appreciates it and I want you to know that you have our support, as well. (Applause.) And you have my thanks for the work you do every day in pursuit of equality on behalf of the millions of people in this country who work hard and care about their communities — and who are gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender. (Applause.)
Now this struggle, I don’t need to tell you, is incredibly difficult, although I think it’s important to consider the extraordinary progress that we have made. There are unjust laws to overturn and unfair practices to stop. And though we’ve made progress, there are still fellow citizens, perhaps neighbors or even family members and loved ones, who still hold fast to worn arguments and old attitudes; who fail to see your families like their families; and who would deny you the rights that most Americans take for granted. And I know this is painful and I know it can be heartbreaking.
And yet all of you continue, leading by the force of the arguments you make but also by the power of the example that you set in your own lives — as parents and friends, as PTA members and leaders in the community. And that’s important, and I’m glad that so many LGBT families could join us today. (Applause.) For we know that progress depends not only on changing laws but also changing hearts. And that real, transformative change never begins in Washington.
(Cell phone “quacks.”)
Whose duck is back there? (Laughter.)
MRS. OBAMA: It’s a duck.
THE PRESIDENT: There’s a duck quacking in there somewhere. (Laughter.) Where do you guys get these ring tones, by the way? (Laughter.) I’m just curious. (Laughter.)
Indeed, that’s the story of the movement for fairness and equality — not just for those who are gay, but for all those in our history who’ve been denied the rights and responsibilities of citizenship; who’ve been told that the full blessings and opportunities of this country were closed to them. It’s the story of progress sought by those who started off with little influence or power; by men and women who brought about change through quiet, personal acts of compassion and courage and sometimes defiance wherever and whenever they could.
That’s the story of a civil rights pioneer who’s here today, Frank Kameny, who was fired — (applause.) Frank was fired from his job as an astronomer for the federal government simply because he was gay. And in 1965, he led a protest outside the White House, which was at the time both an act of conscience but also an act of extraordinary courage. And so we are proud of you, Frank, and we are grateful to you for your leadership. (Applause.)
It’s the story of the Stonewall protests, which took place 40 years ago this week, when a group of citizens — with few options, and fewer supporters — decided they’d had enough and refused to accept a policy of wanton discrimination. And two men who were at those protests are here today. Imagine the journey that they’ve travelled.
It’s the story of an epidemic that decimated a community — and the gay men and women who came to support one another and save one another; and who continue to fight this scourge; and who demonstrated before the world that different kinds of families can show the same compassion and support in a time of need — that we all share the capacity to love.
So this story, this struggle, continues today — for even as we face extraordinary challenges as a nation, we cannot — and will not — put aside issues of basic equality. (Applause.) We seek an America in which no one feels the pain of discrimination based on who you are or who you love.
And I know that many in this room don’t believe that progress has come fast enough, and I understand that. It’s not for me to tell you to be patient, any more than it was for others to counsel patience to African Americans who were petitioning for equal rights a half century ago.
But I say this: We have made progress and we will make more. And I want you to know that I expect and hope to be judged not by words, not by promises I’ve made, but by the promises that my administration keeps. And by the time you receive — (applause.) We’ve been in office six months now. I suspect that by the time this administration is over, I think you guys will have pretty good feelings about the Obama administration. (Applause.)
Now, while there is much more work to do, we can point to important changes we’ve already put in place since coming into office. I’ve signed a memorandum requiring all agencies to extend as many federal benefits as possible to LGBT families as current law allows. And these are benefits that will make a real difference for federal employees and Foreign Service Officers, who are so often treated as if their families don’t exist. And I’d like to note that one of the key voices in helping us develop this policy is John Berry, our director of the Office of Personnel Management, who is here today. And I want to thank John Berry. (Applause.)
I’ve called on Congress to repeal the so-called Defense of Marriage Act to help end discrimination — (applause) — to help end discrimination against same-sex couples in this country. Now, I want to add we have a duty to uphold existing law, but I believe we must do so in a way that does not exacerbate old divides. And fulfilling this duty in upholding the law in no way lessens my commitment to reversing this law. I’ve made that clear.
I’m also urging Congress to pass the Domestic Partners Benefits and Obligations Act, which will guarantee the full range of benefits, including health care, to LGBT couples and their children. (Applause.) My administration is also working hard to pass an employee non-discrimination bill and hate crimes bill, and we’re making progress on both fronts. (Applause.) Judy and Dennis Shepard, as well as their son Logan, are here today. I met with Judy in the Oval Office in May — (applause) — and I assured her and I assured all of you that we are going to pass an inclusive hate crimes bill into law, a bill named for their son Matthew. (Applause.)
In addition, my administration is committed to rescinding the discriminatory ban on entry to the United States based on HIV status. (Applause.) The Office of Management and Budget just concluded a review of a proposal to repeal this entry ban, which is a first and very big step towards ending this policy. And we all know that HIV/AIDS continues to be a public health threat in many communities, including right here in the District of Columbia. And that’s why this past Saturday, on National HIV Testing Day, I was proud once again to encourage all Americans to know their status and get tested the way Michelle and I know our status and got tested. (Applause.)
And finally, I want to say a word about “don’t ask, don’t tell.” As I said before — I’ll say it again — I believe “don’t ask, don’t tell” doesn’t contribute to our national security. (Applause.) In fact, I believe preventing patriotic Americans from serving their country weakens our national security. (Applause.)
Now, my administration is already working with the Pentagon and members of the House and the Senate on how we’ll go about ending this policy, which will require an act of Congress.
Someday, I’m confident, we’ll look back at this transition and ask why it generated such angst, but as Commander-in-Chief, in a time of war, I do have a responsibility to see that this change is administered in a practical way and a way that takes over the long term. That’s why I’ve asked the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to develop a plan for how to thoroughly implement a repeal.
I know that every day that passes without a resolution is a deep disappointment to those men and women who continue to be discharged under this policy — patriots who often possess critical language skills and years of training and who’ve served this country well. But what I hope is that these cases underscore the urgency of reversing this policy not just because it’s the right thing to do, but because it is essential for our national security.
Now, even as we take these steps, we must recognize that real progress depends not only on the laws we change but, as I said before, on the hearts we open. For if we’re honest with ourselves, we’ll acknowledge that there are good and decent people in this country who don’t yet fully embrace their gay brothers and sisters — not yet.
That’s why I’ve spoken about these issues not just in front of you, but in front of unlikely audiences — in front of African American church members, in front of other audiences that have traditionally resisted these changes. And that’s what I’ll continue to do so. That’s how we’ll shift attitudes. That’s how we’ll honor the legacy of leaders like Frank and many others who have refused to accept anything less than full and equal citizenship.
Now, 40 years ago, in the heart of New York City at a place called the Stonewall Inn, a group of citizens, including a few who are here today, as I said, defied an unjust policy and awakened a nascent movement.
It was the middle of the night. The police stormed the bar, which was known for being one of the few spots where it was safe to be gay in New York. Now, raids like this were entirely ordinary. Because it was considered obscene and illegal to be gay, no establishments for gays and lesbians could get licenses to operate. The nature of these businesses, combined with the vulnerability of the gay community itself, meant places like Stonewall, and the patrons inside, were often the victims of corruption and blackmail.
Now, ordinarily, the raid would come and the customers would disperse. But on this night, something was different. There are many accounts of what happened, and much has been lost to history, but what we do know is this: People didn’t leave. They stood their ground. And over the course of several nights they declared that they had seen enough injustice in their time. This was an outpouring against not just what they experienced that night, but what they had experienced their whole lives. And as with so many movements, it was also something more: It was at this defining moment that these folks who had been marginalized rose up to challenge not just how the world saw them, but also how they saw themselves.
As we’ve seen so many times in history, once that spirit takes hold there is little that can stand in its way. (Applause.) And the riots at Stonewall gave way to protests, and protests gave way to a movement, and the movement gave way to a transformation that continues to this day. It continues when a partner fights for her right to sit at the hospital bedside of a woman she loves. It continues when a teenager is called a name for being different and says, “So what if I am?” It continues in your work and in your activism, in your fight to freely live your lives to the fullest.
In one year after the protests, a few hundred gays and lesbians and their supporters gathered at the Stonewall Inn to lead a historic march for equality. But when they reached Central Park, the few hundred that began the march had swelled to 5,000. Something had changed, and it would never change back.
The truth is when these folks protested at Stonewall 40 years ago no one could have imagined that you — or, for that matter, I — (laughter) — would be standing here today. (Applause.) So we are all witnesses to monumental changes in this country. That should give us hope, but we cannot rest. We must continue to do our part to make progress — step by step, law by law, mind by changing mind. And I want you to know that in this task I will not only be your friend, I will continue to be an ally and a champion and a President who fights with you and for you.
Thanks very much, everybody. God bless you. (Applause.) Thank you. It’s a little stuffed in here. We’re going to open — we opened up that door. We’re going to walk this way, and then we’re going to come around and we’ll see some of you over there, all right? (Laughter.) But out there. (Laughter.)
But thank you very much, all, for being here. Enjoy the White House. Thank you. (Applause.)
END 4:53 P.M. EDT
###
Popularity: 1% [?]

Chris, thanks for posting this.
You write: “Yes, I want to see more action, and, sure, there is room for improvement — particularly in regards to Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell — but I am glad to hear directly from our President that he realizes our struggle and wants to work with us — and use his role in the White House — to advance LGBT equality”
How are those different than campaign promises? It’s always nice to hear that someone “realizes our struggle and wants to work with us”, but when that person is the President of the United States, I would like something more substantial. How does he want to work with us? What strides has he might that demonstrate his empathy with his plight? What is his ultimate plan to work towards the repeal of DADT and DOMA. When he wanted his stimulus plan passed, he didn’t merely “call on Congress”- he visited with individual legislators, and the WH drafted entire portions of the bill. When the WH is committed to a cause it shows… and when it comes to GLBT issues, I don’t see *commitment*. Just words…
As I’ve mentioned before, I fully expect Obama to continue with measured approaches by testing the waters, trying to change culture and enacting legislation.
This is indeed a sign of major significance beyond what other presidents have done. But his continued side step of DADT gives me much cause for concern. This is simply the easiest issue for him to tackle.
I don’t expect him to burn political capital over LGBT rights/issues. But DADT is an economic, military and national security issue that leaves him open to less damage politically than an energy bill. His reluctance baffles me especially in light of members of Congress speaking out for some form of action instead of “working” on a plan ONCE DADT is repealed.
Chris,
We don’t ALWAYS agree, but more often than not, I absolutely love what you say on your blog. However, this post is probably one of the BEST POSTS you’ve EVER had. I try to spread the word about YOUR blog on MY blog, as much as I can, and I think out of all of the major LGBT-news bloggers out there, your views are the most sensible, the most enact-able, and best of all, they are always presented so articulately and lovely that it makes it hard to NOT send readers in your direction DAILY. Please keep up the amazing work, and I look forward to many more of these incredible posts in the future!
What strikes me in terms of the White House’s perceived inaction on DADT is that the President may not want to take any executive action regarding military recruitment and management that can set a precedent for some future leader to maliciously misconstrue.
If he were to write an executive order not to pursue DADT cases, might that not open the door to future commanders-in-chief issuing orders for the military not to pursue even more egregious miscarriages of justice?
(I’ve never studied law, so this is an earnest, innocent question without snark. Also, I recognize that it’s a bit “slippery slope”, which I loathe as arguments go, but this administration has been a cautious one overall.)
“Of course, that’s not action.”
I’m afraid it is not even substance. He rehashed all of the things he said during the campaign. He offered no details, dates, specifics. Why on earth would we believe these late-coming words now when we have heard them before and they have been proven to be hollow since inauguration day? Where is the reference to a specific time and conversation that occurred with the Pentagon, with Congress? To whom has he spoken? What exactly did he say? What was the response from the Pentagon and Congress? What exactly will he do if these alleged conversations do not take root?
Stop settling for crumbs.
And those buffoons in the audience applauding the same old words do not represent me.Had they remind silent and just let the words fall on the air, they might have conveyed to the President that those words were not enough. Silence would have conveyed an implied “and then what?,” an implied “and you had these conversations with Congress when?”
I am so embarrassed by the gay people there who applauded as if there were actually substance. You sycophants helped the President win his bet: that he could charm us into forgetting all about the importance of civil rights. Shame on you.
Sorry but it was same sh** different day. Blah Blah Blah. Yadda Yadda Yadda.
Words are not action.
Obama surrounded himself wih Stepford Queers today and made more promises. And tomorrow Lt. Dan Choi will probably be discharged from the Military.
The LEAST he could do is Stop-Loss. It’s shameful that he can look a serviceman in the eye (an officer who’s going to be discharged under DADT in 4-6 months — can’t think of his name) — knowing that he’s going to be discharged & lose his career & NOT issue a Stop-Loss order.
I was waiting for some specifics today, and all I heard was the same bull I heard during the campaign. And all the sycophants applauded like good House Faggots. It was shameful! At least the Air Force Lieutenant who is going to be discharged in 5-6 months got a chance to talk to Obama — not that it did any good, but at least it happened. I’m sure HRC had nothing but good things to say.
I wonder if we can come up with a way in which Obama could ‘limit the damage’ of DADT until it is eliminated by Congress — assuming it will be, and soon.
But I hope I can convey the nausea that phrases like “Stepford Queers” and “House Faggots” causes in me. Y’see, I’m old enough to have heard similar phrases used by “Black Power” advocates who condemned certain blacks for ‘merely being good speakers’ and ‘cooperating with the White PowerStructure’ and therefore ’selling us out.’
There was one particular figure they loved to blast. In fact they were so successful i’d be surprised if anyone remembered the name of that sell-out, that ‘co-opted’ “House nigger.” I do remember he was a Minister from Birmingham who ‘once gave a good speech’ at the Washington Monument, something about a dream.
But they so savaged him that i guess i’m the only person left that remembers him. Wasn’t his last name King, or something like it?
Thank you for your concise summation of what is problematic of about the delay in taking words to action. There has to be immediate responses to the DADT silliness that has gone on for far too long. I take for granted that Stop-Loss is one, to protect our service people now.
However, I do not wish to read (in the future) about how nothing has changed in 4, 6, 8 and more years. I know that ‘public opinion’ is a powerful thing but when citizens are being denied their full rights, the public has to be informed their opinion is erroneous.
A point comes when changes occur and we all go forward. But the point has to come, not just be a hypothetical dream of the future.
We are impressed with how the idea of the executive order option in our “How to End DADT” study has been received. We appreciate you and your readers for continuing to consider our findings. Thanks!
Following the comments to have come from the congressional meeting last week, we actually have a pretty good idea of where things are going on LGBT legislative issues, from hate crimes to ENDA to federal benefits. The White House is not moving as quickly on Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell as I believe they can and should be moving, and I’ve discussed that often. I think that the White House is placing itself well on DOMA, now that it corrects itself in word and, I hope in deed, as Obama addressed his desire for a repeal of DOMA and the fact that the Smelt brief went too far.
The same-sex partner benefits memorandum, Census directive and HIV travel ban work are specific steps public action on which all have taken place in the past two weeks.
And, actually, James, much of the criticism of the Obama White House regarding the stimulus package was regarding how much they let Congress take the lead. I believe that, if anything, he and Rahm have a little too much confidence in the ability of the congressional leadership to move things forward.
Just words … from the President of the United States … to the country. Another good step in the right direction.
And anyone that watched the Gibbs interview on Hardball last night knows that nothing is happening on DADT.
He basically admitted that Obama hasn’t met with the Pentagon, and that the administration hasn’t pressured congress at all.
You can’t permanently Stop-Loss a career service member; it would work only as long as the Reserves are on active duty. See 10 U.S.C. § 12305.