<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#039;s DOJ Did Not Have To Go This Far</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawdork.net/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/</link>
	<description>Same dork, new year!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:38:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DOJ Reply Brief in Smelt Filed</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/#comment-1861</link>
		<dc:creator>DOJ Reply Brief in Smelt Filed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.wordpress.com/?p=1630#comment-1861</guid>
		<description>[...] even need to file a brief will be dissatisfied with the brief because it essentially incorporates the earlier arguments into this reply brief and continues to defend DOMA as a legal matter.  But, for those many people [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] even need to file a brief will be dissatisfied with the brief because it essentially incorporates the earlier arguments into this reply brief and continues to defend DOMA as a legal matter.  But, for those many people [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AG Holder: LGBT Equality Measures Advance &#8216;Our Best Ideals&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/#comment-1313</link>
		<dc:creator>AG Holder: LGBT Equality Measures Advance &#8216;Our Best Ideals&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.wordpress.com/?p=1630#comment-1313</guid>
		<description>[...] now-infamous DOMA brief filed by the Holder Justice Department in the Smelt case placed Attorney General Eric Holder &#8212; and, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now-infamous DOMA brief filed by the Holder Justice Department in the Smelt case placed Attorney General Eric Holder &#8212; and, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Week Ahead &#171; Law Dork, 2.0</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>The Week Ahead &#171; Law Dork, 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.wordpress.com/?p=1630#comment-488</guid>
		<description>[...] DOJ: The Gill brief is coming.  How will it differ from the Smelt brief?  How will it look the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DOJ: The Gill brief is coming.  How will it differ from the Smelt brief?  How will it look the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmartRemarks » The Obama DOMA drama</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>SmartRemarks » The Obama DOMA drama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.wordpress.com/?p=1630#comment-489</guid>
		<description>[...] he&#8217;s being lambasted from the left, and particularly the GLBT community. Some commentators are explicitly putting the blame for this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he&#8217;s being lambasted from the left, and particularly the GLBT community. Some commentators are explicitly putting the blame for this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We&#8217;ve Got Their Attention, Let&#8217;s Use This &#171; Law Dork, 2.0</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>We&#8217;ve Got Their Attention, Let&#8217;s Use This &#171; Law Dork, 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.wordpress.com/?p=1630#comment-487</guid>
		<description>[...] a week of the filing of the brief in Smelt v. United States, the Obama Administration has done the first step with Wednesday&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a week of the filing of the brief in Smelt v. United States, the Obama Administration has done the first step with Wednesday&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I&#8217;m at a Loss &#171; Law Dork, 2.0</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>I&#8217;m at a Loss &#171; Law Dork, 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.wordpress.com/?p=1630#comment-486</guid>
		<description>[...] a week of the filing of the brief in Smelt v. United States, the Obama Administration has done the first step with Wednesday&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a week of the filing of the brief in Smelt v. United States, the Obama Administration has done the first step with Wednesday&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Possibility . . . &#171; Law Dork, 2.0</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>A Possibility . . . &#171; Law Dork, 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.wordpress.com/?p=1630#comment-485</guid>
		<description>[...] it possible, looking at the Smelt v. United States DOJ brief and now this, that these concerns, although buck-stopping only at Obama, should first be considered [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it possible, looking at the Smelt v. United States DOJ brief and now this, that these concerns, although buck-stopping only at Obama, should first be considered [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The DNC Fundraiser &#171; Law Dork, 2.0</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>The DNC Fundraiser &#171; Law Dork, 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.wordpress.com/?p=1630#comment-484</guid>
		<description>[...] in my criticism of others&#8217; takes on the Smelt filing is that I, too, had some real problems with the brief.  I believe it is right to express those concerns, but I also believe that, once [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in my criticism of others&#8217; takes on the Smelt filing is that I, too, had some real problems with the brief.  I believe it is right to express those concerns, but I also believe that, once [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primary Documents &#171; Gem Reads</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Primary Documents &#171; Gem Reads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.wordpress.com/?p=1630#comment-483</guid>
		<description>[...] http://lawdork.wordpress.com/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/ Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)All Eyes to me…Can documents be sexy? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://lawdork.wordpress.com/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/" rel="nofollow">http://lawdork.wordpress.com/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/</a> Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)All Eyes to me…Can documents be sexy? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where the Cart Falls Off the Track &#171; Law Dork, 2.0</title>
		<link>http://lawdork.net/2009/06/12/obamas-doj-did-not-have-to-go-this-far/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Where the Cart Falls Off the Track &#171; Law Dork, 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawdork.wordpress.com/?p=1630#comment-477</guid>
		<description>[...] a comment &#187;  The uproar over how overreaching the Obama DOJ&#8217;s DOMA brief was has let to a virtual meltdown in LGBT America.  For the first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a comment &raquo;  The uproar over how overreaching the Obama DOJ&#8217;s DOMA brief was has let to a virtual meltdown in LGBT America.  For the first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

