The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation has been around for some time now, and it has as its mission the following:
The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) is dedicated to promoting and ensuring fair, accurate and inclusive representation of people and events in the media as a means of eliminating homophobia and discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.
A blog that I’ve recently begun following today reported on “Monitoring Coverage of LGBT Issues in the Media,” and so I was prepared for a piece about GLAAD. But then, with no mention of GLAAD or its blog in the entire post, Michael Jones goes on to describe a new project of the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association, RE:ACT, the NLGJA blog, which is “a forum to discuss topics related to fair and accurate coverage of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) issues.”
I mean, don’t get me wrong, we can always use more than one viewpoint on a project, but I am curious about whether there is some rift between the two groups, between Jones and GLAAD, or if NLGJA just decided that they didn’t have a blog and should.
In any event, it would appear that there are now two options for following questions about fair and accurate reporting on LGBT issues in the media.
Popularity: -0% [?]

You would think two organizations with a such a strong common purpose would joing forces more than they have.