I Agreed With Pat Buchanan?

ars

Andrew Ross Sorkin, whose DealBook column today I discussed earlier, was on Hardball this evening, opposite Pat Buchanan.

I’m really not quite sure what just happened, but I think I sat here — for the most part — agreeing with Pat.  His argument was that others have had to take a hit in this economy, so why shouldn’t the very people who caused some of the significant problems of this crisis.

Sorkin and Buchanan on Hardball today.

Sorkin and Buchanan on Hardball today.

I also was glad to hear Buchanan call out the idea, defended by Sorkin, that these are “the best and the brightest,” as AIG CEO Liddy argued in his letter to Treasury Secretary Geithner.  The best argument, advanced by Sorkin, is that no one really wants to work for AIG right now — but Buchanan is right that it probably shouldn’t take a $3 million bonus to be able to find someone to help “wind down” the Financial Products division, as Liddy apparently intends to do.

Popularity: 1% [?]

About the Author

Chris Geidner is the award-winning senior political editor at D.C.'s Metro Weekly and has written for The Atlantic Online, The American Prospect, Advocate.com, Salon and other publications, as well as at his blog, Law Dork. In 2011, he received the Excellence in News Writing Award from the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association for his coverage of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" repeal. Prior to moving to D.C. in 2009, he served as an attorney on the senior staff at the Ohio Attorney General's Office and had earlier worked for a leading Columbus law firm. An extended biography can be found here, and you can follow him on Twitter.