By Chris GeidnerPublished: February 11, 2009Posted in: Uncategorized
I think these people were involved in the bailout valuation process.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCJ3Oz5JVKs]
Truly, it is worth the three minutes to hear this debate about whether a .002 dollars is the same as .002 cents.
Customer service guy: “They’re both the same if, if you look at ‘em on paper-wise.”
Customer: “No, they’re not, actually.”
And later:
Customer service manager: “Well, I mean, it’s obviously a difference of opinion.”
Customer: “It’s not opinion.”
Popularity: 1% [?]
About the Author

Chris Geidner is the award-winning senior political editor at D.C.'s Metro Weekly and has written for The Atlantic Online, The American Prospect, Advocate.com, Salon and other publications, as well as at his blog, Law Dork. In 2011, he received the Excellence in News Writing Award from the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association for his coverage of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" repeal. Prior to moving to D.C. in 2009, he served as an attorney on the senior staff at the Ohio Attorney General's Office and had earlier worked for a leading Columbus law firm. An extended biography can be found
here, and you can
follow him on Twitter.
Reminds me of a tollway sign in Dallas that, until recently, said the charge for using the tollway was “.50 cents.” Clearly, they meant for customers to pay 50 cents, not half a penny. The tollway authority finally changed the sign to read, “$0.50.” I’m still contemplating a class-action suit upon graduation to recover the 49.5 cents we all overpaid during the last several years.